Pepsi Next

WHAT HAPPENED TO PEPSI NEXT — WHY IT FAILED

© History Oasis

Seeking to exploit growing demand for lower sugar beverages, PepsiCo strategically unleashed Pepsi Next in 2012, an ingenious mid-calorie cola reconciling the flavor of sugary Pepsi with health trends.

Brandishing a ingenious formula with 60 percent less sugar, Pepsi Next targeted mainstream Pepsi drinkers and those averse to the taste of artificial sweeteners; initial feedback proved deeply polarized, as some praised its likeness to normal Pepsi whilst others grimaced at its lingering diet aftertaste.

Though briefly introduced across a handful of international markets, Pepsi Next struggled to attract sales or brand loyalty in its aim to dominate the novelty mid-calorie niche, mirroring the swift demise of precursor Pepsi Edge just years prior—ultimately, PepsiCo surrendered ambitions for its would-be revolutionary creation.

THE INITIAL FORMULA CONTAINED ARTIFICIAL SWEETENERS LIKE ASPARTAME ALONG WITH HIGH FRUCTOSE CORN SYRUP

Pepsi Next Logo
Source: PepsiCo

Initially suffused with aspartame and high fructose corn syrup in a combination cloying to many palates, Pepsi Next swiftly stirred controversy regarding its artificiality.

Nonetheless, undeterred by criticisms of an over processed flavor, PepsiCo reformulated the upstart beverage in 2013 sans aspartame, preserving other additives to prolong its shelf-life.

This revised concoction proved no less polarizing, as diet-conscious drinkers still recoiled at the lingering chemical aftertaste associated with non-nutritive sweeteners—a scientifically honed recipe could not override reflexive consumer wariness.

Regardless, PepsiCo persisted with its grand experiment for a season more, unable to perfect the alchemical balance between wholesome taste and caloric thrift the everyman demanded.

PEPSI NEXT WAS MARKETED AS HAVING A TASTE CLOSER TO REGULAR PEPSI COMPARED TO DIET OPTIONS

vintage pepsi ad
Source: PepsiCo

Casting its difference as a virtue, PepsiCo embarked on a zealous crusade to evangelize Pepsi Next as a delicious middle ground, enlisting the star power of Eva Longoria amongst other lucre-lavished celebrities to dispel doubts it resembled yet another pallid diet soda.

Awash in public relations ploys portraying Pepsi Next as indistinguishable from its time-tested namesake yet with heightened health credentials, PepsiCo made a hard pivot towards health-motivated demographics.

The ostensibly "guilt-free" soda steeped in real cane sugar aimed to reconcile America's epicurean cravings with its expanding waistlines.

However, as subsequent years foretold, the company had overestimated the populace's appetite for compromise, finding that the greatest fidelities lie with unalloyed vices rather than half-measures.

RECEPTION WAS MIXED

Pepsi Next ad with ice
Source: PepsiCo

Befitting its strained attempts to straddle two opposed cola worlds, initial tastings of Pepsi Next underscored the implausibility of conciliating such contradictory flavors in one bottle: while some drinkers extolled its likeness to sugar-sweetened Pepsi, finding its reduced calorie content an added bonus, dissenting voices condemned its being too strongly haunted by the cloying chemical specter of diet sodas past.

Though expressly engineered to appease both palates in a historic compromise, Pepsi Next fell victim to the endemic polarization it endeavored to temper; in attempting to please all, it achieved satisfaction among none.

Its failure spoke to certain immutable truths—that one cannot augment without diminishing elsewhere—in beverages as in life, most hold sacrosanct the unalloyed over the adulterated.

PEPSI NEXT WAS INTRODUCED IN A FEW TEST MARKETS IN THE U.S. IN 2012

Pepsi Next ad
Source: PepsiCo

Greeted by Georgia test markets in 2012 amid a glitzy blitz of promotion hailing an inflection point in soda's evolution, Pepsi Next would never advance beyond these scattered Southern enclaves into a broader American consciousness despite its parent company’s prodigious lobbying.  

Bereft of leverage to secure mass retail adoption in the years hence, distribution stagnated at its handful of trial redoubts, portending the imminent demise of a would-be blockbuster unable to transcend niche curiosity status.

With dismal sales signaling the American people’s cold indifference, PepsiCo quietly divested itself of scale rollout aspirations, allowing Pepsi Next to evolve into little more than a provincial curiosity.

IT WAS ALSO LAUNCHED IN SOME INTERNATIONAL MARKETS LIKE AUSTRALIA AND CANADA IN LATER YEARS

Pepsi Next ad
Source: PepsiCo

While initially confined to select American test markets, Pepsi Next’s distribution widened in ensuing years to encompass international theaters—albeit scarcely more receptive—as the embattled beverage sought refuge across the waters.

From Australia to the Netherlands and beyond, intermittent debuts kept alive ephemeral hopes that foreign palates would embrace what Yankee tastebuds spurned.

Each short-lived launch proved but another coda in Pepsi Next’s protracted public death knell.

Bereft of any foothold in hearts or supermarket aisles, overseas rollouts tapered and supply chains withered, closing the book on a globetrotting flash-in-the-pan. The world had tasted Pepsi Next’s promise, but found it lacking.

PEPSI NEXT APPEARED TO STRUGGLE GAINING A FOOTHOLD IN THE MARKET BETWEEN REGULAR AND DIET SODAS

Diet Pepsi ad
Source: PepsiCo

Conceived in an era of seismic consciousness surrounding soda's health impact, Pepsi Next sought to straddle divergent consumer appetites by proffering full-bodied cola flavor at calorie counts contemporaneous with elderly Diet Pepsi.

However, in chasing both rabbits PepsiCo caught neither, as Pepsi Next struggled perennially to lure either demographic from their unadulterated allegiances and into the tepid middle grounds: lean buyers instinctively suspected hidden tradeoffs while hedonists flinched from the looming specter of artificiality sullying their pure sugary worship.

Bereft of momentum as a compromise too compromised for any conviction, Pepsi Next lingered for a time as ships passed silently in the night, leaving hardly a ripple when inevitably discontinued from scant interest.

Its lofty aspirations toward reconciling flavor, health, and sales proved sadly misguided seeds sown on inhospitable ground.

THE FAILURE OF PEPSI EDGE, A SIMILAR MID-CALORIE OFFERING PEPSI TRIED IN 2004 BUT DISCONTINUED JUST TWO YEARS LATER, SUGGESTING CONSUMERS DID NOT EMBRACE THE MID-CALORIE COLA CONCEPT

Pepsi Edge can
Source: PepsiCo

Foretelling its imminent reprise in Pepsi Next, the swift collapse of precursor Pepsi Edge evinced the company’s failure to learn from its recent history—though the earlier offering withered on store shelves within two years of its unveiling in 2004, PepsiCo poured renewed resources into an equally tepid reboot.

The light sweetness and middling calories it peddled sat poorly amidst a cola market dominated by the uncompromising poles of full-flavor or no-flavor—bereft of a niche, Pepsi Edge was but the ghostly harbinger of Next’s destiny, and PepsiCo thrice proved unable to sell temperance to the American consumer market.

Ultimately it was a bridge too far, a compromise too compromised, for a public acculturated to certainties.

Collection

Tags

Next