Twice As Much For a Nickel

TWICE AS MUCH FOR A NICKEL

© History Oasis

From a catchy jingle to bold marketing tactics, Pepsi's 1939 "Twice as Much for a Nickel" campaign employed innovative strategies to double its market share during the Great Depression.

We will examine how this ambitious soda war gambit emphasized value, targeted youth, and initiated an enduring brand persona as the industry's plucky contender against dominant Coca-Cola.

The campaign's integrated messaging across radio, vehicles, and taste tests foreshadowed modern marketing and shaped generations of Pepsi ads promoting fun.

PEPSI OFFERED THEIR COLA FOR A NICKEL TO OUTCOMPETE AGAINST COCA-COLA

One of Pepsi's original costs a nickel adds
Source: PepsiCo

Ah yes, that catchy little ditty that had the nation humming its way through the trying times of the Great Depression.

Looking back at the "Twice as Much for a Nickel" campaign—the jingle was a stroke of marketing genius.

Pepsi had only been around since the late 1890s, but they were still very much the plucky newcomer doing battle against the mighty Coca-Cola by the late 1930s.

Coca-Cola already had its graceful contour bottle and was ubiquitous thanks to its inventive soda fountains.

Yet here was Pepsi, with this bouncy, infectious song pointing out its competitive advantage—twice as much cola for the same 5 cents!

It was David wielding his slingshot at Goliath. The song emphasized value and volume, two things cash-strapped consumers dearly needed.

And my, did it ever work!

Pepsi was still a fledgling, regional bottler when they rolled out that number in 1939. But by the end of WWII, Pepsi had reached national distribution parity with Coke.

The "nickel drink" song boosted name recognition and loyalty across the country. Jaunty Pepsi delivery trucks kept the twin messages of more for less and quality taste on the nation's roads.

THE 1939 CAMPAIGN BOOSTED SALES DURING THE GREAT DEPRESSION

A depression era Twice as much for a nickel pepsi ads
Source: PepsiCo

By 1939, the economic devastation had dragged on for a full decade, plunging families into poverty and prioritizing every penny. Pepsi seized on this national thriftiness with its “Twice as Much for a Nickel” campaign.

While Coca-Cola was still serving its iconic 6.5oz Coke for a nickel, Pepsi made the savvy move to offer 12 full ounces per bottle for the very same 5 cents.

Essentially giving the middle finger to the dominant giant by providing double the product. It was a scrappy longshot dare, but a calculated one.

By specifically targeting younger, more budget-conscious consumers, Pepsi tapped directly into the raw nerve of financial hardship pulsing through the country.

Their radio jingles blanketed the airwaves, emphasizing Pepsi’s greater value per sip. Bright colored delivery trucks acted as roving billboards for the nickel drink worth a dime.

By 1942, less than 3 years after launch, Pepsi had entrenched itself in the market and doubled its percentage of soda drinkers.

Over a million new customers added, hordes converted by that irresistible message of more for less.

Why choke down 6 ounces when you could quaff a full 12? Pepsi leaned into the national attitude of penny-pinching and came out ahead.

TWICE AS MUCH FOR A NICKEL USED BOLD MARKETING TACTICS BEYOND THE JINGLE

a pepsi ad with a woman enjoying a nickel pepsi on the beach
Source: PepsiCo

The blitz demonstrated early mastery of what we now call integrated marketing.

Sure, that catchy radio jingle touting twelve full ounces for a buffalo nickel was the crown jewel. But Pepsi augmented the infectious musical message in creative ways.

Rival Coca-Cola dominated restaurant fountain outlets, so Pepsi countered by blanketing the highways and byways with brightly-colored delivery trucks.

Emblazoned on every vehicle was the declaration "Nickel Drink Worth a Dime", cementing value perception. And like a presidential motorcade, they traveled in caravans, multiplying product exposure.

Pepsi even rolled out attention-grabbing blind taste tests in prominent public venues, cheekily challenging Coke's brand supremacy.

Customers tasted two unmarked sodas and voted for preferred flavor. Consumers chose Pepsi by the droves, affirming its better beverage virtue.

The cumulative scope and daring of these additive efforts composited into outsized impression and conversancy.

By amplifying the musical mantras via visual, kinesthetic and gustatory channels, Pepsi prosecuted multi-front sensory persuasion.

They understood holistic marketing's ability to embed deeper into popular awareness. The campaign struck a winning chord across communication channels by playing consumers from every angle.

IT PAVED THE WAY FOR FUTURE PEPSI CAMPAIGNS EMPHASIZING FUN

Future fun Pepsi ads
© PepsiCo

The campaign served as an opening shot across the bow in what would become an enduring brand battle—the so-called Cola Wars.

While the jaunty jingle and value proposition decisively captured recession-weary consumers, the campaign’s legacy proved far greater. It initiated and validated an enduring brand ethos for Pepsi as a contrarian upstart continually challenger category king Coca-Cola.

The marketing stratagems demonstrated Pepsi’s penchant for consumer empathy and joy-based positioning over Coke’s stoic market dominance.

The message looked ahead, not behind. This orientation seeded the success of later generation Pepsi mnemonic slogans—“The Pepsi Generation”, “Catch That Pepsi Spirit”, “Choice of a New Generation”.

By adopting ambitious aspirational messaging and weaving its carbonated product into the cultural zeitgeist of music, celebrity and entertainment, Pepsi perpetuated the dynamic persona of industry disruptor.

As Coke committed branding malpractice by attempting to introduce New Coke in 1985, Pepsi solidified itself as the choice aligned with the upbeat modern spirit.

Truly, the “Twice as Much” campaign birthed the challenger mindset and empowered Pepsi marketing to construe soda consumption not just as tasty and price preference, but as lifestyle and identity choice.

Us vs Them.Therefore setting the stage for nearly a century of calculated cola wars across advertising, retail channels and consumer emotional connections.

Collection

Next